SHERIDAN — A Senate committee has rejected a bill to exempt necessary hygiene products from taxation in Wyoming.
The Essential Health Product Dignity Act, sponsored by the Joint Revenue Interim Committee, aimed to exempt feminine hygiene products and diapers from being taxed in the state. The bill was also proposed during the Legislature’s 2020 session, when it failed to receive a positive vote from two-thirds of the Senate’s members on introduction for it to move forward to potentially become law.
Sen. Affie Ellis, R-Cheyenne, who presented the bill Tuesday to the Senate Revenue Committee, said most states exempt non-luxury necessities or essential items.
“In Wyoming this includes things like groceries, prescription drugs and prosthetics,” Ellis said, explaining how state law exempts a list of things.
Ellis said most Wyoming businesses currently tax diapers and feminine hygiene products, considering them under state law as a “luxury.”
“However, I can tell you that these items are not luxury at all,” Ellis said. “For a woman to live with dignity, these items are often expensive and there have been numerous examples of people who have come to me who talk about the fact that, particularly for young girls if their parents don’t have funds, that it can be very difficult to get your hands on these products.”
Currently, 13 states exempt them entirely from taxation.
In 2018, females ages 18-24 were the largest demographic living in poverty, according to datausa.io, which pulls from U.S. Census Bureau data. That age range often encompasses women needing feminine hygiene products and mothers needing to purchase diapers for children.
“The cost (for feminine hygiene products) adds up, and it’s a unique cost that women bear,” Ellis said.
Following that demographic are men in the same age range, then females 25-34, who also may fall under the parenting demographic.
The bill also could have impacted elderly individuals who pay taxes on adult diapers.
“For those that have done elder care for a loved one, a grandparent, a parent, you know that purchasing diapers is very much a matter of dignity,” Ellis said. “A lot of people don’t like buying them altogether, but in the instances they have to, they’re very expensive. And unfortunately as I’ve seen with a lot of end-of-life cases, these things are hot commodities.”
The loss of tax revenue would result in a $939,000 reduction in Fiscal Year 2022 from the general fund and $903,000 in the local sources fund.
Sen. Tom James, R-Rock Springs, moved to amend the bill to gender neutralize it to include all hygiene products.
“If we make it to just feminine products, it doesn’t really encompass what our state is about and it segregates and favors one sex over the other,” James said. “I’m not saying what happens with women is not important and that type of thing, I just think that when it comes to hygiene, both sexes are necessary to have that hygiene maintenance.
“Guys with soaps and foot powder and all of that kind of stuff, we’re out working in the field, out in the mines, out in the oil field, wherever we work. I know it’s nowhere near what women go through, so it’s not a comparison, but we still have our hygiene products that we have to have as well,” he said.
The amendment failed 2-3, with James and Chair Sen. Cale Case, R-Lander, voting in favor. Those opposed to the amendment said the exemption of all hygiene products, due to the fiscal impact and lack of application for a need for feminine products for men, caused them to vote against it.
The fiscal impact of the bill cuts a large chunk out of statewide funding, and so Sens. Fred Baldwin, R-Kemmerer, and Stephan Pappas, R-Cheyenne, expressed concern over it passing on the floor of the Senate if it moved out of committee.
The bill failed 2-3 and will not move to the floor for the second legislative session in a row.
January 27, 2021 at 06:30PM
https://ift.tt/3opxxD5
Wyoming lawmakers aim to keep taxing diapers, feminine products - Jackson Hole News&Guide
https://ift.tt/2Comt7j
Diapers
No comments:
Post a Comment